SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(P&H) 1918

GURMIT RAM
PURPLE HEALTH CARE PRIVATE LTD. – Appellant
Versus
HARI PARSAD SINGLA – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Amit Jain, Advocate

ORDER :

Gurmit Ram, J.

This revision petition is filed by the petitioner-tenant against the order dated 21.2.2015 passed by the learned Rent Controller, Gurgaon vide which the application under Order 7 Rule 11 read with Section 151 CPC filed by the petitioner - tenant has been dismissed. The brief facts as mentioned in this revision petition are that the respondent - landlord has filed an ejectment petition under Section 13 of The Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 (in short - 'the Act') seeking ejectment of the petitioner - tenant from the demised premises on the ground of non-payment of rent w.e.f. 1.10.2014 till 31.1.2015 @ Rs. 2,87,500/- per month and service tax @ 12.36% on the amount of arrears of rent due w.e.f. 1.10.2012 to 31.3.2013. It is also mentioned in this revision that earlier ejectment petition filed by the respondent - landlord is also pending before the Court of learned Rent Controller, Gurgaon.

2. In the above-said former ejectment petition, the present petitioner - tenant filed an application under Order 7 Rule 11 read with Section 151 CPC for the rejection of this ejectment petition which was dismissed by the Court of learned Rent Controller v










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top