SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 2902

SHEKHER DHAWAN
RAM CHANDER – Appellant
Versus
JAI NARAYAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :N.C. Kinra, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Dr. Shekher Dhawan, J.

1. Present regular second appeal against concurrent findings of both the Courts below, whereby suit of the plaintiffs for permanent injunction was dismissed and first appeal, filed by the present plaintiffs/appellants, was also dismissed.

2. For the sake of convenience, parties are being referred to as per their status before the Court of first Instance. Relevant facts for the purpose of decision of the present appeal that as per plaintiffs, Dhani Ram was the owner of the suit land. Dhani Ram died more than 40 years back and before his death he had given suit land to Luxmi Narain alias Lichmi Narain, who also died more than 35 years back. Present plaintiffs are legal heirs of Luxmi Narain. Dhan Pal, son of Luxmi Narain died and he was unmarried. Dhani Ram, original owner, had given land for cultivation to Luxmi Narain without payment of any rent. Dhan Pal, son of Luxmi Narain, had executed a Will on 6.9.1996 in favour of Ram Chander. The other plaintiffs relinquished their share in favour of Ram Chander in a family settlement. Plaintiff Ram Chander became owner of 1/4th share. Sons of Dhani Ram and his daughter-in-law Smt. Nanhi died and the defendant















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top