SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 3377

KULDIP SINGH
Brijesh Puri – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

KULDIP SINGH, J.

1. Petitioners, who are officers of HDFC Bank, Branch Leela Bhavan, Patiala have sought quashing of FIR No.112 dated 06.05.2014, registered under Sections 406/409, IPC at Police Station Gobindgarh Mandi, District Fatehgarh Sahib, along with subsequent proceedings arising therefrom. The short facts, which require to be narrated, are that respondent No.2 obtained loan of RS. 4,62,000/- on 22.03.2011 for which he pledged gold weighing 352.600 gms (net weight 295.800 gms) under the Gold Loan Scheme. The application for obtaining loan is Annexure P/2. It also comes out that gold was valued and valuation thereof was signed by the complainant on 22.03.2011.

2. Subsequently, the loan of RS. 4,62,000/- was accordingly sanctioned vide agreement dated 22.02.2011 (Annexure P/3). Another sum of RS. 1,52,000/- was advanced against the said gold in addition to the original loan and the gold was accordingly again valued for RS. 6,14,672.40/- on 28.02.2013 which was also signed by the complainant. It also comes out that another loan of RS. 2,85,000/- was advanced by the HDFC Bank vide application (Annexure P-11) and gold weighing 221.900 gms (net weight 182.410 gms) was ple





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top