SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 3387

DAYA CHAUDHARY
Pehlu – Appellant
Versus
Khatiza – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Madhu Ranjan
For the Respondent: Rakesh Dhiman

JUDGMENT :

Daya Chaudhary, J.

Crl. Misc. No.4298 of 2016

1. This application has been moved for placing on record the reply.

2. Criminal Misc. Application is allowed and the reply is taken on record.

Crl. Misc. No.M-18294 of 2015

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C for quashing of Complaint case No.26 dated 17.09.1998 under Sections 498-A, 406, 506 read with Section 34 IPC pending before the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Nuh, on the basis of compromise.

2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the marriage of petitioner was solemnized with respondent on 07.05.1991. Respondent-wife filed a complaint against the petitioner and his parents and hence, they were summoned to face trial. The parents of the petitioner, who were also accused in the said complaint, have been acquitted of the charge by the trial Court. The petitioner was declared as proclaimed offender. Thereafter, a compromise was arrived at between the parties and both of them started to live together. It was agreed in the compromise that the complainant-respondent will withdraw the complaint filed under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

3. Learned counsel








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top