SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(P&H) 2315

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
HEMANT GUPTA, RAJ RAHUL GARG, JJ.
Jand Singh and Others - Appellant
Vs.
State of Punjab - Respondent
Criminal Appeal Nos. D-731-DB and D-967-DB of 2010
Decided On : 28-09-2015

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sant Pal Singh Sidhu and Sidakmeet Singh Sandhu
For the Respondent: Manjari Nehru Kaul

The central legal point established in the judgment is the importance of evidence, compliance with legal provisions, and the role of the investigating officer in establishing guilt in cases involving narcotic substances.

Headnote:

Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act - Conviction under Section 15 - 15 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the provisions of Section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 and emphasized the compliance with Section 42 of the Act. The court also considered the defense of the accused and the evidence presented by the prosecution, highlighting the importance of secret information and the role of the investigating officer in establishing guilt.

Fact of the Case:

The prosecution alleged that the accused were involved in the sale of poppy husk and were apprehended with a large quantity of the substance. The accused denied the allegations and claimed innocence, presenting a defense that they were falsely implicated due to a tiff with the police.

Finding of the Court:

The court found the accused guilty based on the evidence presented by the prosecution, including the recovery memo and consistent statements of witnesses. The court rejected the defense's claim of false implication, emphasizing the presence of the investigating officer at the spot and the compliance with Section 42 of the Act.

Issues: The issues revolved around the possession of contraband, compliance with legal provisions, and the defense of false implication.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the recovery memo, consistent witness statements, and the role of the investigating officer to establish the guilt of the accused. The court also emphasized the importance of compliance with Section 42 of the Act in cases involving secret information.

Final Decision: The appeals were dismissed, and the judgment of conviction and order on sentence were maintained, with a modification reducing the sentence from 12 years to 10 years for both appellants.

JUDGMENT :

Raj Rahul Garg, J.

The aforesaid two appeals have been directed against the judgment of conviction dated 2.7.2010 rendered by the learned Judge, Special Court, Kapurthala whereby the appellant-accused Jhand Singh and Ajmer Singh were convicted for committing an offence punishable under Section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter mentioned as the Act), whereas Lakhwinder Singh was acquitted for the reason that the prosecution has failed to prove its case against him beyond any shadow of reasonable doubt. Vide order of sentence of the even date, both the appellants were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 12 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1.00 lac each and in default of payment of fine to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for a period of 1 1/2 years each for the offence under Section 15 of the Act.

2. Briefly, prosecution case is like this: that on 2.8.2007, DSP Balbir Singh received a secret information that Lakhwinder Singh @ Lakha and Jhand Singh son of Deva Singh indulge in the business of sale of poppy husk on a large scale. They bring poppy husk from Gwalior and supply the same in different cities of Punjab. That day, both of them were bringing poppy husk by truck bearing fake registration No. PB-08-AD-7902 by keeping the same under the bags of "mausmis". They are coming from the side of Kartarpur and going towards the area of Begowal-Bholath to supply poppy husk. In case, a nakabandi at 'Bein bridge' in the area of Bholath is laid, they can be apprehended red-handed. Finding this information reliable, DSP sent information to SSP, Kapurthala through HC Puran Singh. Ruqa Ex. PH was sent to the Police station for registration of the case against the accused through constable Gurmit Singh, on the basis of which formal FIR Ex. PB was recorded. Memo Ex. PC was prepared by DSP Balbir Singh for conducting the search without obtaining the warrants and sent the same to Court through Constable Gurvinder Singh. DSP reached the spot, i.e., 'Bein bridge' Bholath where SHO Gurbachan Singh along with police party reached. Ranjit Singh son of Darshan Singh was joined in the investigations of this case. At about 10 pm, one truck bearing registration No. PB-08-AD-7902 was seen coming from the side of Kartarpur. SHO gave signal with the help of torch to stop the truck. The truck came to a halt. Ajmer Singh (accused) was driving the aforesaid truck and Jhand Singh (accused) was sitting on the co-driver seat. DSP disclosed his identity to the accused and told them that he was having suspicion that they were in possession of some contraband. He also apprised them of their legal right of search by a Gazetted Officer or a Magistrate. However, the accused reposed confidence in the DSP. Their consent memo Ex. PD and Ex. PE were prepared. The same were signed by the accused besides witnesses on the direction of DSP. Inspector Gurbachan Singh conducted search of the truck whereupon 39 gunny bags containing poppy husk were recovered as the same were lying under the bags of 'mausmis'. All the bags were unloaded from the truck. Inspector Gurbachan Singh separate two samples of 250 grams each from each of the recovered gunny bags of poppy husk. On weighment, the remainder was weighed to 35 kilograms in each bag. All the aforementioned samples as well as 39 gunny bags were converted into parcels and sealed with the seal bearing impression 'BS' and the same were taken into police possession vide memo Ex. PF. Form No. 29-C was also prepared at the spot. Seal after use was handed over to Ranjit Singh PW. CFSL form was also taken into possession vide aforesaid memo. Rough site plan of the place of occurrence was prepared as Ex. PG. 70 bags of 'mausmis' were also taken into police possession vide memo Ex. PH. Statements of witnesses were recorded. Accused Jhand Singh and Ajmer Singh were arrested. Accused as well as the case property were handed over to Inspector Gurbachan Singh who hande











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top