SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(P&H) 1916

RAJBIR SEHRAWAT
Rajvir Singh @ Raju – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
Present:Mr. B.S.Khehar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Hitten Nehra, Addl. AG, Punjab.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Rajbir Sehrawat, J.-The question which this court is called upon to consider and decide in this application for bail pending trial is; whether it is the quantity of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substance only or whether it is the total quantity of mixture of narcotic drug and psychotropic substance mixed with any non-psychotropic substance, neutral or otherwise, which is to be taken into consideration for seeing the commercial quantity of the recovered material, as required under Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 ( in short – the NDPS Act )

2. This is an application for grant of bail during trial in case FIR No.38 dated 25.05.2017 registered under Section 22 of the NDPS Act registered at Police Station Sadar Banga District SBS Nagar.

3. The above said FIR was registered against the petitioner with the allegations that ASI Satnam Singh, of Police Station Sadar Banga, sent an information to the police station for registration of the FIR mentioning the name of the petitioner; alleging therein that the above said ASI al


























































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top