SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 3462

RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Neelam Rani – Appellant
Versus
Anish Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:Mr. Ashok Jindal, Advocate.
For the Respondent No.2:Ms. Rajni, Advocate.
For the Respondent No.3:Mr. Amit Kundra, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Raj Mohan Singh, J.:- Appellant-claimant has filed this appeal for enhancement of compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bathinda (for short ‘Tribunal’).

2. Claimant-appellant filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short ‘the Act’) claiming compensation on account of injuries suffered by her in a vehicular accident which took place on 23.04.2011.

3. Claimant was 38 years of age at the time of accident. Appellant is a house wife and claimed that she rendered services to the family which can be computed in terms of Rs.6000/- per month. On 23.04.2011, she was a pillion rider on scooter driven by Mehak. At about 10:30 p.m, when they reached near Bharat Nagar at Bibi Wala Road, Bathinda, then the offending motorcycle came from opposite direction which was rashly and negligently driven by respondent No.1 and struck against the scooter. Claimant suffered multiple injuries. The husband of the claimant was following the injured. Injured was taken to hospital. On account of head injury, she was referred to Bharat Bra























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top