SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(P&H) 2900

T.P.S.MANN, MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU
Harpal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. G.B.S. Dhillon, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Mr. Mahabir Singh Sindhu , J .:- The applicant-Harpal Singh has filed the present application under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘Cr.P.C’) seeking leave to appeal against the impugned judgment dated 15.03.2017 passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Amritsar, for short ‘Trial Court’ acquitting present respondents No. 2 to 7 of the charges framed against them whereas Manpreet Singh co-accused was held guilty for committing the offence punishable under Section 302, 326 read with Section 34 of IPC, 324 read with Section 34 of IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, accused-Gurpal Singh was convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of IPC, 326 of IPC and 324 read with Section 34 of IPC and accused-Sukhdeep Singh was convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of IPC, 326 read with Section 34 of IPC and 324 of IPC.

2. The prosecution story in brief is that on 05.07.2014 complainant- Harpal Singh got recorded his statement (Ex. PA) by alleging that on 04.07.2014 at about 9.15 p.m., Prabhdeep Singh alias Ricky son of Sahib Singh, who is his cousin brother was going in his Indica Car towards his fields and when he reached on Fatehgarh Ch

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

  The entry lists the following cases:

    (i) State of Bihar, (2002) 2 RCR(Criminal) 544;

    (iv) Harpal Singh vs. State of Punjab, (2002) 1 RCR(Criminal) 227;

    (iii) Amar Singh vs. State of Punjab, (1996) 1 RCR(Criminal) 465;

    (ii) Jaleshwar Singh vs. …

  No subsequent treatment (followed, distinguished, overruled, etc.) is indicated in the supplied list. Therefore the judicial status of these cases remains unknown based solely on the given material.

  The entry lists the identical set of cases as in ID 02300074282:

    (i) State of Bihar, (2002) 2 RCR(Criminal) 544;

    (iv) Harpal Singh vs. State of Punjab, (2002) 1 RCR(Criminal) 227;

    (iii) Amar Singh vs. State of Punjab, (1996) 1 RCR(Criminal) 465;

    (ii) Jaleshwar Singh vs. …

  Again, the list provides no indication of subsequent judicial treatment. Consequently, the status of these cases cannot be determined from the supplied data.

**Source :** Rajesh @ Raja And Others VS State Of Haryana - Punjab and Haryana Rajesh @ Raja & Ors. VS State Of Haryana - Punjab and Haryana

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top