SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(P&H) 2904

T.P.S.MANN, MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU
Baruram through his dauther Anita – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Abhishek Yadav, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Mahabir Singh Sindhu, J .:- The applicant has filed the present application under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, for short ‘Cr.P.C.’ for seeking special leave to appeal against the judgment dated 30.07.2016 vide which respondents No.2 and 3 have been acquitted by Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Hisar, for short ‘Trial Court’, from the charges under Sections 498-A/326/307/34 of Indian Penal Code, for short ‘IPC’.

2. Initially, the complaint was filed by applicant/complainant- Baruram and later on he died and the same was pursued by his daughter Anita. The brief facts of the case are that the applicant is the resident of Krishna Colony, Jind Road, Hansi and his daughter Anita was married on 20.02.2002 with respondent No.2-Hawa Singh. Sufficient dowry was given, but after six months of the marriage, accused persons started harassing his daughter on account of demand of dowry. To meet their demand, the complainant gave some more money and other articles and in due course Anita became pregnant and thus, the accused started more harassment to his daughter. Her mother-in-law-Gina Devi threatened that she would be turned out of the house and there is no ch











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top