SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(P&H) 2082

REKHA MITTAL
Jago Ram @ Jagdish – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Committee, Kalanaur – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:Mr. Parveen Kaushik, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mrs. Rekha Mittal, J.:- The present appeal directs challenge against judgment and decree dated 12.10.2016 passed by the Additional District Judge, Rohtak whereby appeal filed by Municipal Committee, Kalanaur– respondent No.1 against the judgment and decree dated 01.08.2015 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Rohtak (hereinafter to be referred as the trial Court) has been partly allowed by reversing findings recorded by the trial Court on issue No.2.

2. The facts relevant for disposal of the present appeal are that the appellant/plaintiff staked his claim for declaration with consequential relief of permanent injunction on the premise that he is owner in possession of house bearing No.1006-B/H situated in W. No.7, Kalanaur, District Rohtak. The name of the appellant was correctly recorded as owner in possession of the said house in the Municipal records but later name of defendant No.1/respondent No.2 has been recorded on the basis of illegal order dated 16.07.2004. The appellant had taken electric and water connection in the said house. The identity card and ration card were also issued which are important pieces of evidence to prove ownership and possession of pla









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top