SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(P&H) 2107

HARI PAL VERMA
Kimati – Appellant
Versus
Krishna – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Arun Yadav, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Mr. Hari Pal Verma, J.- The petitioner has filed present revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugning the order dated 17.04.2017 (Annexure P-5) passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Rewari, whereby the application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC for rejection of the plaint filed by the applicant-defendant No.4 Smt. Kimati (petitioner herein), was dismissed.

2. Briefly stated, plaintiff Smt. Krishna (respondent No.1 herein) had filed an election petition titled as “Krishna Versus District Panchayat Election Officer-cum-Deputy Commissioner, Rewari and others challenging the election of petitioner Smt. Kimati to the office of Panch of Gram Panchayat, Ambarpur, Block Rewari. The election to the office of the Gram Panchayat was held on 10.01.2016 for which nominations were filed between December 23, 2015 to December 29, 2015. As per the election petition, defendant No.4 Smt. Kimati (petitioner herein), who was elected as a Panch, was disqualified as she had furnished wrong facts in the nomination form. During pendency of the petition, defendant No.4 Smt. Kimati (petitioner herein) had filed an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC for rejec



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top