SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(P&H) 2163

ANITA CHAUDHRY
Kastoori Lal Dhir – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. L.M. Gulati, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Rahul Rathore, DAG, Punjab.
Mr. S.S. Behl, Advocate for respondent No.2.

JUDGMENT

Mrs. Anita Chaudhry, J.:- In this petition, the petitioners are seeking quashing of FIR No.56 dated 15.09.2014 registered under Section 376 of IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act 2012 and Sections 328/ 420/ 467/ 468/ 471/ 506 and 120-B IPC at Police Station Daresi, Ludhiana, District Ludhiana.

2. Pleadings are complete.

3. The petitioners are the parents of Pawan Dhir. They claimed that they have a separate mess and separate business. A complaint was lodged by respondent No.2 containing allegations of fraud, forgery and rape against Pawan Dhir and his parents. The allegations were that the complainant’s father has a Utensils shop in Meena Bazar, Ludhiana and the main accused Pawan was working in the Jewellary shop in a shop opposite to their shop. It was claimed that Pawan had become friendly with the complainant’s mother and he become a regular visitor to their shop and house. The complainant has alleged that Pawan used to meet her often and gained her confidence. In January, 2014 Pawan told the complainant that he had constructed a new house in Rishi Nagar, Ludhiana and asked her to see it. In good faith the complainant (aged 17 years old) went to see the house along with Pawa
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top