Mr. A.B. Chaudhari, J.:- Being aggrieved by the judgment/order dated 29.09.2010/05.10.2010 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Faridabad, in Sessions Case No.95 (RBT) of 30.09.2009, by which the appellant, namely Amiruddin, was convicted for commission of offence punishable under Section 302 and 304-B of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC’) and sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for life and to pay fine in the sum of Rs.50,000/-; in default of payment of fine, to further undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for one year, the present appeal has been preferred by the appellant-Amiruddin.

FACTS

2. In brief, the prosecution case is that the deceased Saiyna was remarried to the appellant-Amiruddin, resident of Gulawasti, District Bulandshahar (UP), on 27.04.2008. Saiyna had two daughters from her first marriage, but her daughters were carried by her to the house of Amiruddin. They started residing at Faridabad and Amiruddin was working in an Industry and used to get good salary also. His mother, Haseena used to taunt Saiyna saying that her mother had not given anything in the marriage and that they were to marry Amiruddin somewhere else in order to get good dowry amount.