SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(P&H) 2227

AMIT RAWAL
Satbir Singh – Appellant
Versus
Sajno Devi – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. R.K. Sharma, Advocate for the appellants.
Mr. Jaivir Yadav, Advocate for the respondents.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Amit Rawal J.(Oral).:- C.M. No.10419-C of 2017

1. The application for impleading the legal representatives of deceased-appellant No.2 namely Dharambir Singh is allowed subject to all just exceptions and the legal representatives are ordered to be brought on record.

2. Application is allowed.

RSA No.1977 of 2013

3. The appellants-defendants are in appeal against the judgment and decree rendered by the lower Appellate Court whereby the suit of the respondent-plaintiff seeking possession of the property in dispute has been decreed.

4. Before adverting to the rival contentions of the counsel appearing for the parties, it would be apt to give preface of the matter. Sajno Devi and Kanto daughter of Dharam Singh instituted the suit for possession of house situated within the abadi deh of village Ladrawan, Tehsil Bahadurgarh, District Jhajjar as per the description given in the plaint on the premise that earlier their father namely Dharam Singh was owner in possession of one residential house measuring 178 square yards. The appellant No.1-defendant No.1 got executed






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top