SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(P&H) 2240

P.B.BAJANTHRI
Harpal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Jasraj Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Nikhil K. Chopra, Addl. A.G., Punjab.

JUDGMENT

Mr. P.B. Bajanthri, J. (Oral) - In the instant petition, petitioner has sought for quashing order dated 04.03.2017 (Annexure P/5) passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hoshiarpur by which petitioner was declared a proclaimed offender in case FIR No.72 dated 28.06.2015, registered at Police Station City, District Hoshiarpur for offences punishable under Sections 420, 471, 177, 193, 196, 198, 199 and 200 of the Indian Penal Code and consequential registration of FIR No. 108 dated 20.09.2017, registered at Police Station City, District Hoshiarpur, under Section 174-A of Indian Penal Code as well as consequential order dated 20.11.2017 vide Annexure P/9.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that ordering proclaimed person is not in accordance with procedure. It was further submitted that proclamation procedure was published on 28.01.2017, whereas petitioner was asked to appear on 22.02.2017. Thus, clear 30 days has not been notified with reference to the date of publication of proclamation (28.01.2017). It was further contended that statement of HC Surinder Singh No. 920, PS City, Hoshiarpur is relating to communication of publication at various places. When the p






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top