SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(P&H) 2278

TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA
Sumanpreet Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Yadwinder singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Ms. Ekta Thakur, Advocate for the appellants.
Mr. Jasmeet Ghumman, Advocate for respondents no.1 & 2.
Ms. Vandana Malhotra, Advocate for respondent no.3.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Tejinder Singh Dhindsa. J (Oral) -This is claimants’ appeal seeking enhancement of compensation.

Brief facts that may be noticed are that Kulwant Kaur died in a motor vehicle accident on 20.12.2011 while she was traveling in a car bearing registration no. PB-65-P-3459.

2. The claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 was filed before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (hereinafter to be referred as the Tribunal), S.A.S. Nagar, Mohali by the claimants, who happen to be the two daughters, son and husband of the deceased. Compensation to the tune of Rs.20 lacs was claimed.

3. Upon the pleadings of the parties, the following issues were framed by the Tribunal:-

“1. Whether respondent no.1 was driving car bearing registration no. PB-23-E-0270 in rash and negligent manner and struck against the car bearing no. PB-65-P-3459 due to which Kulwant Kaur died?OPD

2. Whether the claimants are entitled to compensation, if so, at what rate?OPD

3. Whether driver of the car was not holding valid and effective driving license?OPR

4. Whether the offendin















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top