Mr. Inderjit Singh, J.- Applicant-Prem Singh has filed this application under Section 378(4) Cr.P.C. seeking permission for leave to appeal against State of Punjab and other respondents, challenging the impugned judgment dated 18.09.2014 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Batala, vide which the accused-respondents were acquitted.

2. It is mainly stated in the application that accompanying appeal is being filed which is likely to succeed on the grounds taken therein. It is, therefore, prayed that leave to appeal be granted.

3. As per the record, complainant Prem Singh filed a complaint against accused Pawan Kumar, Neelam, Kashmiri Lal and Lakhjit Rai under Sections 326, 324, 323, 452 and 34 IPC. The brief averments of the complaint as noted by down in the judgment passed by learned JMIC, Batala, are as under:-

“Complainant has filed the present complaint against the accused persons with the version that on 13.11.2003 at about 9/10 A.M., complainant alongwith his wife and son were present in their house, when all the accused in connivance with each other entered the house of the complainant. Accused No.1 and 3 were armed with daters and entered in his house. The