SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(P&H) 2358

RITU BAHRI
Kamaljit Singh – Appellant
Versus
Karam Chand – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. P.K. Kataria, Advocate for the appellant
Mr. Manish Bansal, Advocate for respondent

JUDGMENT

Ms. Ritu Bahri, J. (Oral):- This order of mine shall dispose of the above two petitions wherein challenge is to the judgment dated 11.08.2014 passed by learned Appellate Authority, Amritsar whereby judgment dated 17.07.2013 passed learned Rent Controller, Amritsar was upheld, vide which the ejectment application of the landlords was allowed on the ground of bonafide need.

2. Brief facts of the case are that respondent Nos. 1 and 2/landlords (herein after to be referred as ‘the landlords’) are owners of property bearing Shumari No. 2309/10-12 situated in Nai Gali, Katra Singh, Amritsar and have purchased the same for consideration vide two sale deeds dated 30.07.2007 and 31.07.2007 from its owner Smt. Paramjit Kaur.

3. Petitioners were inducted as tenants by its previous owner in private shops Nos. 1 and 2. It was an oral tenancy with delivery of possession. The petitioners had paid rent up March, 2007 at the rate of Rs.400/- per month for both shops and got receipts from its previous landlady i.e Paramjit Kaur. It was mutually agreed between the respondents and previous landlady that rate of rent will increase by 5% in the month of April every year and it was also agreed that
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top