SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(P&H) 2360

RITU BAHRI
Kirpal Singh @ Kirpal Chand – Appellant
Versus
Satish Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Amit Jain Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. S.C. Chhabra, Advocate, for respondents

JUDGMENT

Ms. Ritu Bahri, J. :- Petitioner (tenant)-Kirpal Singh @ Kirpal Chand has filed the present civil revision against the findings recorded by Ld. Rent Controller, Ferozepur and the Appellate Authority, Ferozepur, vide orders dated 06.10.2012 and 22.10.2014, respectively for ejectment of petitioner under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban rent Restriction Act, 1949, whereby he has been ordered to be evicted from the demised premises on the ground of personal necessity.

2. The respondent-landlord is the owner of portion consisting of one room shown in red colour and the same is part of Court yard, bath room on the ground floor and one room and latrine on the first floor and the same is situated in Mohall Lala Jagan Nath Kakar, Ferozepur City. The petitioner is a tenant in the portion mentioned above on payment of monthly rent of Rs.85/-plus house tax. The respondent sought eviction of the petitioner on the grounds mentioned below:-

(i) The petitioner has neither paid nor tendered the arrears of rent for the period 01.11.2008 till the filing of the eviction petition.

(ii) Further the respondent required the portion in dispute for the use of shop in question for his son namely Parv






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top