SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(P&H) 2394

DAYA CHAUDHARY
Ajay Grover – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Jitender Dhanda, Advocate.
Mr. Hittan Nehra, Addl. A.G., Punjab.

JUDGMENT

Mrs. Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral): This petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.440 dated 25.12.2017 registered under Section 61 of the Punjab Excise Act and Sections 420, 465, 468, 471 of IPC and Sections 103, 104 of Trademark Act at Police Station Zirakpur.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the case. He further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 25.12.2017. Investigation of the case has been completed and petitioner is no more required as challan has been presented. Even the FSL report has not been received and charges have not been framed. The trial may take long time to conclude.

3. Learned counsel also submits that the offence is triable by the Magistrate. Learned State counsel has opposed the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner.

4. By considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 25.12.2017 and also the fact that FSL report has not been received so far; the offence is triable by the Magistrate and only the challan has been presented; the trial may take l


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top