SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 3471

AJAY TEWARI
Joginder Singh @ Lala – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Ms. Satwant Mehta, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Ms. A.K.Khurana, Addl. A.G., Punjab.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Ajay Tewari, J.: (Oral) - Vide this common order above mentioned two petitions are being disposed of as they arise from the same FIR.

2. These are two petitions filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.69, dated 23.06.2014, registered under Sections302/307/341/506/427/148/149 of the IPC read with Sections 25/27/54/59 of Arms Act, P.S. Chohla Sahib, District Tarn Taran.

3. Learned Counsel for the petitioners has argued that the petitioners have been in custody more than two years and not a single witness has been examined and they are not attributed a single injury to the deceased.

4. Learned Addl. A.G., Punjab on instructions from ASI Narender Singh, has accepted these factual assertions.

5. In these circumstances, without commenting upon the merits of the case, and keeping in view the period of custody already suffered by the petitioners, I do not deem it appropriate to deny the concession of regular bail to them.

6. Bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

7. Petitions stand disposed of.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top