Darshan Singh, J.

The present revision petition has been preferred by the petitioner-defendant against the order dated 02.05.2016 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Charkhi Dadri, whereby the application moved by the petitioner for getting examined the questioned documents from the Central Forensic Science Laboratory, Chandigarh/Hydrabad/Shimla, has been dismissed.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that there are two contradictory reports of the hand writing experts produced before the learned trial Court. He contended that there is a material controversy in the suit that as to whether the father of the petitioner had executed the pronote and receipt in question and borrowed a sum of Rs. 21 lacs from the plaintiff-respondent. He contended that in order to do the complete justice, the learned trial Court should have sent the questioned documents i.e. pronote and receipt to the Central Forensic Science Laboratory, Chandigarh/Hydrabad/Shimla for examination.

3. He further contended that the petitioner is a retired senior Army officer and is a dead-honest person. The fraud has been committed by the plaintiff-respondent at his back. The