Raj Mohan Singh, J.

Petitioners have challenged order dated 05.03.2016 passed by Additional District Judge, Gurgaon vide which application filed by the respondents under Order 11, Rule 14 read with Section 151 CPC and read with Section 165 of the Evidence Act was partly allowed.

2. Petitioner No.1 is a Company and is governed by the laws of United States of America. Petitioner No.1 provides various services of the internet such as e-mail, social networking sites etc. Similarly, petitioner No.2 is also a Company under the laws of United States of America. Petitioner No.2 is an online service provider and provides a platform for watching and sharing videos worldwide through the website www.youtube.com. Petitioner No.2 is a subsidiary of petitioner No.1-Company.

3. Plaintiffs filed a suit for permanent injunction, damages and rendition of accounts for infringement of copyright of the plaintiffs. Para No.9 of the plaint give details of films produced, directed and distributed by the plaintiffs and the plaintiffs were having copyrights of the same. Para No.9 of the plaint reads as under:-

9. The plaintiff has produced, directed, acquired and distributed several films till date and