AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
Sartaj – Appellant
Versus
State of Union Territory – Respondent
Ajay Kumar Mittal, J.
The revisionist-petitioner was convicted for an offence under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code (I.P.C) and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years and to pay a fine of Rs. 2000/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one month by the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Chandigarh vide judgment and order dated 14.8.2012. However, the petitioner was acquitted of the charge under Section 406 I.P.C by the trial Court. Against the said judgment of conviction and order of awarding sentence, the petitioner filed an appeal before the Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Court, Chandigarh, who vide judgment dated 30.10.2014 while dismissing the appeal upheld the conviction and sentence of the accused-petitioner. Feeling aggrieved by the said judgment, the petitioner has filed the present revision petition.
2. A few facts necessary for adjudication of the instant revision petition may be noticed. Complainant Anita Rani made a complaint dated 25.11.2005 to the Police of Police Station, Sector 3, Chandigarh against Sartaj Rana (petitioner herein), Smt. Hardai, Smt. Kushal and Vija
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.