SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 28

SUDIP AHLUWALIA
Darshan Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Dilawar Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Vikas Bahl, Adv., Shubreet Kaur, Adv., M.L. Saggar, Adv., Armaan Saggar, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Sudip Ahluwalia, J.

The Regular Second Appeal No.1054 of 2008 has been preferred against the impugned Judgment and Decree passed by the Ld. Addl. District Judge, Jalandhar in R.C.A. No.166 of 2006 dated 22.10.2007, vide which the original Judgment & Decree passed by the Ld. Addl. Civil Judge (Senior Division) Phillaur in Civil Suit No.819 of 2003 dated 05.09.2006 in favour of the present Appellants/Plaintiffs were upheld. Another RSA No.80 of 2010 has also been filed against the impugned Judgment and Decree passed by the Ld. Additional District Judge, Jalandhar in RBT RCA No.149 of 2008 dated 27.07.2009, whereby the original Judgment & Decree passed by the Ld. Civil Judge (Junior Division), Phillaur in Civil Suit No.593 of 2004 dated 04.04.2006 in favour of the present Appellants/Defendants were modified.

2. These two Appeals were heard by this Court together, since the contesting parties involved in both are by and large the same and the decision on merits in RSA No.80 of 2010 would be vital for determining the fate of RSA No.1054 of 2008. Consequently, the said Appeal, which although is latter in point of time, is taken up for consideration first, as its decision will g

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top