SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 34

ANIL KSHETARPAL
Suresh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Vijay Singh, Adv., Sanjay Kumar Saini, Adv., R.N. Lohan, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Anil Kshetarpal, J.

By way of this petition under the complainant has challenged the order dated 01.03.2016 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Safidon as also the order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge dated 18.07.2017, whereby the revision petition has been dismissed against the order dated 01.03.2016 being not maintainable.

2. Some facts are required to be noticed. On the complaint of petitioner, FIR No.169 dated 03.10.2012 under Sections 148, 149, 323, 324 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code was registered at Police Station Pillukhera against five persons including the private respondents for inflicting injuries to the present petitioner and two others. After completion of the investigation, challan was filed. Charges were framed and trial is pending before the court of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Safidon.

3. Petitioner pleads that he received injuries and he was taken to local hospital from where he was referred to Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, where medico-legal report was prepared by Dr.Mahesh and x-ray report was required to be proved. For that purpose, it was necessary to examine Dr.Mahesh and Dr.Vinay Mahir. Ho












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top