SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 181

RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, HARNARESH SINGH GILL
Jitender Soni – Appellant
Versus
Manisha Verma – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ranjan Lakhanpal, Adv., Rajesh Arora, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

HARNARESH SINGH GILL, J.

1. The present appeal has arisen out of the judgment and decree dated 28.7.2015 passed by the learned District Judge, Family Court, Gurgaon vide which petition filed by the appellant-husband under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short 'the Act'), was dismissed.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant-husband was married to the respondent according to Hindu rites and ceremonies on 24.11.2008. It was an arranged marriage. No child was born out of the said wedlock. The assertions made by the appellant before the Family Court were that while going to Manali for honeymoon just after 2-3 days of marriage, the respondent tried to jump out of the running taxi and started shivering and on many occasions she used to talk in foul language and kept herself locked in bathroom for several hours. It was also averred that the respondent-wife would lit lamp at night and many times she used to sleep for 24 hours at a stretch. The appellant-husband approached the parents of the respondent-wife but they extended no help. The appellant gathered information from the neighbours of the respondent-wife that before marriage, the respondent-wife
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top