HARNARESH SINGH GILL
Dharam Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
HARNARESH SINGH GILL, J.
1. The petitioners were tried for committing the offences punishable under Sections 326/324/323 read with Section 34 IPC. Vide judgment and order dated 24.1.2002, learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Rajpura, held petitioner-accused Dharam Singh guilty under Section 326 IPC, whereas the remaining accused-petitioners guilty under Section 326 read with Section 34 IPC. Accused-petitioner Sukhwinder Singh was held guilty under Section 324 IPC whereas the remaining accused-petitioners were held guilty under Section 324 read with Section 34 IPC. All the accused-petitioners were further held guilty under Section 323 read with Section 34 IPC. The accused were accordingly, sentenced as under:-
Under Section
Imprisonment
Fine
In default of payment of fine
326 IPC
3 years RI
Rs.500/- each
To undergo RI for 30 days
324 IPC
1 year RI
Rs.300/- each
To undergo RI for 20 days
323/34 IPC
6 months
200 each
To undergo RI for 10 days
2. Aggrieved there-against, the petitioners preferred an appeal before the learned Ses
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.