SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 185

HARNARESH SINGH GILL
Dharam Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.S. Sullar, Adv., Gautam Dutt, Adv., Sarabjit Singh Cheema, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

HARNARESH SINGH GILL, J.

1. The petitioners were tried for committing the offences punishable under Sections 326/324/323 read with Section 34 IPC. Vide judgment and order dated 24.1.2002, learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Rajpura, held petitioner-accused Dharam Singh guilty under Section 326 IPC, whereas the remaining accused-petitioners guilty under Section 326 read with Section 34 IPC. Accused-petitioner Sukhwinder Singh was held guilty under Section 324 IPC whereas the remaining accused-petitioners were held guilty under Section 324 read with Section 34 IPC. All the accused-petitioners were further held guilty under Section 323 read with Section 34 IPC. The accused were accordingly, sentenced as under:-

Under Section

Imprisonment

Fine

In default of payment of fine

326 IPC

3 years RI

Rs.500/- each

To undergo RI for 30 days

324 IPC

1 year RI

Rs.300/- each

To undergo RI for 20 days

323/34 IPC

6 months

200 each

To undergo RI for 10 days

2. Aggrieved there-against, the petitioners preferred an appeal before the learned Ses

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top