SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 190

MANOJ BAJAJ
Hari Kishan Garg – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.S. Hundal Dinesh Trehan, Adv., Parveen Aggarwal, Adv., T.S. Sangha, Adv., Narinder Singh, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

MANOJ BAJAJ, J.

1. Petitioner Hari Kishan Garg has preferred this criminal revision to challenge the order dated 16.8.2012 passed by Special Judge, Jind in Sessions Case No.2 dated 4.6.2012, arising out of FIR No.832 dated 29.11.2010, registered under Sections 174, 186, 189 IPC and Section 3 of SC & ST Act, Police Station City Jind, whereby he was ordered to be charge-sheeted under Sections 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act (for short 'SC & ST Act') and Section 186/189 of the IPC.

2. Brief facts leading to the present revision petition are that Anuj Garg son of Hari Kishan Garg was married to Sweety daughter of Madan Lal Goyal on 7.12.2009. However, the relations between them got strained further resulting into lodging of complaint by Sweety wife of Anuj Garg through an application dated 22.10.2010. The said application was marked to Incharge, Women Cell for verification of facts and immediate necessary action by the Superintendent of Police, Jind on the same day. It was Inspector Bishni Devi who was handling the complaint and issued notice under Section 160 Cr.P.C. to Anuj Garg, his parents and brother, namely, Gaurav son of Hari Kishan Garg. As pe

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top