SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 264

ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
Paramjit Singh @ Pammi – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Rishabh Gupta, Adv., Joginder Pal Ratra, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Arvind Singh Sangwan, J.

Prayer in this petition is for quashing of order dated 19.01.2018 (Annexure P-3), vide which, an application filed by the petitioner under Section 391 Cr.P.C. for leading additional evidence and to allow him to take photographs of his standard and disputed handwriting for comparison through a Handwriting Expert has been dismissed.

2. Brief facts of the care are that the petitioner along with four other co-accused, namely Amarjit Singh, Prem Sagar, Pawan Kumar and Jagdeep Singh, faced trial in FIR No. 26 dated 19.02.2008, under Sections 409, 420, 465, 466, 467, 468, 471, 477-A and 120-B of the IPC and the trial Court, after conducting a full length trial, vide judgment dated 02.03.2016, held the petitioner guilty of hatching conspiracy with co-accused Jagdeep Singh and others, who were not nominated as accused by the Investigating Officer, and has misappropriated 36000 liters of diesel being employee of the Punjab Roadways. Accordingly, the petitioner was held guilty for commission of offence punishable under Sections 409, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of the IPC and was sentenced to undergo a maximum sentence of three years and to pay the fine under the p



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top