A.B. CHAUDHARI, SURINDER GUPTA
State of Haryana – Appellant
Versus
Padam @ Parmod – Respondent
A.B. Chaudhari, J.
By this common judgment and order, above said all the appeals/MRC are being disposed of.
2. Being aggrieved by the judgment/order dated 18.12.2015/21.12.2015, in Sessions Case No.61/2015, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtak, by which the appellants/accused persons, namely Padam @ Parmod, Pawan, Sarwar @ Billu, Manbir @ Manni, Rajesh @ Ghochru, Sunil @ Mada and Sunil @ Sheela were convicted for commission of offence punishable under Sections 302, 376-D, 366, 201 read with Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'IPC') and sentenced, the present appeals were filed by the appellants/accused persons. They have been sentenced as under:-
"I. The convicts Rajesh @ Ghouchru, Pawan, Sunil @ Mada, Padam @ Parmod, Sarwar @ Billu, Manbir @ manni and Sunil @ Sheela are sentenced to death for offence punishable under section 302 read with Section 120-B of Indian Penal Code. Accordingly the convicts be hanged by neck till they are dead. Fine of Rs.50,000/-to each of the convict is also imposed and in default of payment of fine such convict shall undergo imprisonment for a period of two months.
II. Life imprisonment which shall mean impr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.