SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 350

ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
Roop Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Narinder Lucky.

JUDGMENT :

Arvind Singh Sangwan, J.

1. Prayer in this appeal is for setting-aside the judgment dated 26.09.2016 passed by the trial Court vide which respondents No. 2 to 5 were acquitted of the charge under Sections 120-B, 380 and 497 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short IPC) (though one of the co-accused namely Ashok Kumar was convicted for the charge framed against him under Section 497 IPC and he was sentenced to undergo 02 years rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo imprisonment for a period of 01 month).

2. Counsel for the applicant at the very outset, has stated that said Ashok Kumar had filed an appeal i.e. Criminal Appeal No. 503/2016 vide Filing No. 7793/2016 titled as Ashok Kumar vs. State of Punjab and Another, challenging the aforesaid judgment of conviction dated 26.09.2016 under Section 497 IPC and the same was allowed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalandhar vide judgment dated 12.12.2017 (which is taken on record as Mark 'X') and even, Ashok Kumar was acquitted of the charge framed against him under Section 497 IPC.

3. Brief facts of the case are that the applicant-Roop Lal, who is a NRI and is























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top