SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 401

JAISHREE THAKUR
VINOD KUMAR CHOPRA – Appellant
Versus
NARAIN SINGH – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Anmol Rattan Sidhu, Shiv Kumar Sharma, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Jaishree Thakur, J.

The instant Regular Second Appeal has been filed by the appellant-plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as 'the appellant') assailing the judgment and decree dated 21.03.2015 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) Gurgaon (now Gurugram), which was affirmed in appeal by the lower Appellate Court.

2. In short, the facts of the case as alleged are that, the respondent-defendant (hereinafter referred to as 'the respondent') agreed to sell the suit property to the appellant for a total consideration of Rs.14,85,000/- per acre on 18.08.2003, out of which a sum of Rs. 2,00,000/- was paid through cheque and a sum of Rs. 50,000/- was paid in cash as earnest money and the sale deed was to be executed on 30.09.2003 on receiving the balance sale consideration. The respondent was to obtain No Objection Certificate under Section 7-A of the Haryana Urban Development & Regulation of Urban Area Act, 1975 in favour of the appellant prior to the execution and registration of the sale deed, but the respondent did not obtain the NOC. It is averred that the appellant has always been ready and willing to perform his part of the contract on payment of balance sale con

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top