SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 458

HARI PAL VERMA
Kamlesh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:Mr. Ivneet Singh Pabla, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Priyanka Sadar, AAG, Haryana.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Hari Pal Verma, J.(Oral).:- Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.280 dated 09.07.2018 registered under Sections 304-B, 34 of IPC at Police Station Salhawas, District Jhajjar.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the deceased Priyanka was married with Vinod Kumar on 18.07.2013 and out of their wedlock, a child was born to them. The allegation against the petitioner (mother-in-law) is demand of dowry and beating on the person of deceased, for which, she burnt herself. He has further argued that demand of a car and that too after more than 5 ½ years, is unrealistic. One son born to the deceased is staying with the petitioner’s family. The co-accused Balbir has already been admitted on bail by this Court vide order dated 25.01.2019 passed in CRM-M-44755-2018 titled as “Balbir Versus State of Haryana”. Moreover, the trial in the case will take sufficient long time. The petitioner is in custody since 27.08.2018 and no useful purpose would be served to keep the petitioner in custody for unlimited period.

3. Learned State counsel does not dispute the custody. However, she s





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top