MANOJ BAJAJ
State of Haryana – Appellant
Versus
Ram Saran – Respondent
Mr. Manoj Bajaj, J.:- The State of Haryana is in criminal revision to assail the order dated 18.5.2009 passed by Special Judge, Faridabad whereby respondent (accused) was discharged in case FIR No.23 dated 23.1.2006 registered at Police Station Mujessar for the offences under Section 135, 138 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (for short ‘the Act’)
2. The brief facts leading to the revision are that a checking party of Dakhsin Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. (for short ‘DHBVNL’) inspected the premises of M/s Faridabad Hotel Delite Pvt. Ltd., Plot No.23B, Industrial Area, Faridabad owned by Ram Saran Bhatia (accusedrespondent) on 17.1.2006. It was found that there was dishonest use of electricity, which is punishable under Sections 135 and 138 of the Act. According to the report, loss of Rs.63,33,347/- was caused. Thereafter, a formal complaint was made by the SDO(OP), Sub Division No.3, DHVBNL, Sector 22, Fariadabad whereupon case FIR No.23 dated 23.1.2006 for the offences under Sections 135 and 138 of the Electricity Act, 2003 was registered. Prior to it, a demand notice was issued on 19.1.2006 giving the respondent 3 days’ time for compounding the offences by paying the amount,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.