SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(P&H) 2538

INDERJIT SINGH
Bhupinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Pawan Sharda, Sr. DAG, Punjab.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Inderjit Singh, J. - Petitioner-Bhupinder Singh has filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.10 dated 16.01.2018, registered at Police Station Cantonment, District Amritsar City, under Sections 61/1/14 of the Punjab Excise Act.

2. Notice of motion was issued in this case.

3. Learned State counsel has appeared on behalf of the respondent-State and contested this petition.

4. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned State counsel and have gone through the record.

5. As per the allegation in the FIR, the present petitioner was not apprehended from the spot. Only secret information was against him. As per the prosecution, 97 bottles of illicit liquor from a plastic can were recovered.

6. In pursuance of the interim order dated 08.02.2018, passed by this Court, the petitioner has already joined the investigation. Recovery has already been effected. He is not required for custodial interrogation. No useful purpose would be served by sending the petitioner to custody.

7. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case; without discussing the facts of the case in minute details and wit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top