SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(P&H) 2582

ANMOL RATTAN SINGH
Sukhwinder Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Hardev Kaur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:Mr. L. S. Mann, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Respondents ex parte.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Anmol Rattan Singh, J. - This revision petition has been filed by the contesting defendant in a suit filed by the respondents-plaintiffs, seeking separate possession of the suit property, which is stated to be a residential house measuring 4 marlas in village Mehatpur, Tehsil Nakodar, District Jalandhar, by partition thereof. The petitioner seeks setting aside of the order, Annexure P-6, passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Nakodar, on 18.12.2014, by which an application filed by the petitioner-defendant, seeking to lead additional evidence, has been dismissed.

2. Notice having been issued in this petition on February 26, 2015, with the trial Court directed not to pass the final order at that stage (the said interim order still continuing), though the respondents are all seen to be finally served only on 26.05.2016, even thereafter they have not put in any appearance, either personally or through counsel. Consequently, on the date that judgment was reserved in this petition (August 03, 2018), they were ordered to be proceeded against ex parte.

A perusal of the impugned order shows that in her application, the petitioner had contended that she could not

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top