SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(P&H) 2615

A.B.CHAUDHARI, KULDIP SINGH
Vikram – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:Ms. Rajni Paul and Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocates,, for appellant.
Mr. Vivek Saini, DAG Haryana.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Kuldip Singh, J - This appeal is directed against judgment dated 19.3.2013, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jind, vide which accused-appellant was convicted under Sections 304-B and 406 IPC and vide order of sentence dated 21.3.2013, sentenced as under :-

Offence

Rigorous Imprisonment Fine

In default of payment of fine

304-B IPC

Life

Rs. 5000/- SI for two months

406 IPC

1 (one year)

Rs. 1000/- SI for 15 days

2. Both sentences shall run concurrently.

3. Nisha Devi, wife of present appellant Vikram, died on 27.9.2011 after consuming some poisonous substance. The police on receiving the intimation reached the spot where Om Parkash, father of deceased Nisha, made a statement to the police to the effect that he is running a Tea rehri (cart). He has got three daughters and two sons. His daughter Nisha was married with accused Vikram about 16 months back. He had given sufficient dowry as per his capacity. Nisha Devi gave birth to a female child, who was aged about 6/7 months at the time of her death. Om Parkash





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top