Mr. Anil Kshetarpal, J. (Oral) - As per office report dated 12.06.2018, the respondent has been duly served. This Court with the help of Court master has checked the report on the summons, the tenant has been served, however, she has not chosen to appear and contest.

2. Landlady-petitioner is in the revision petition against the orders passed by the learned Rent Controller affirmed by the Appellate Authority dismissing the petition under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949.

3. The landlady sought eviction of the respondent-tenant with specific assertions that the house in question was owned by Mohinder Pal, his brother and wife of the brother namely Harjinder Kaur. The respondent was inducted as a tenant in a room No.4 at the monthly rent of Rs.1200/- in May, 2011, but thereafter, she also occupied room No.5 and 6 with an excuse that the respondent want her independent entry in the premises. Hence, the rate of rent was fixed at Rs.3500/- per month. It was claimed that she has not paid rent @ Rs.3500/- per month w.e.f. June, 2011. It was further pleaded that since the tenant was not paying the rent, therefore, an application was moved before the P