SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(P&H) 2660

RAJ SHEKHAR ATTRI
Puneet Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Amandeep Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:Mr. Rajiv Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Vishal Aggarwal, Advocate for the respondent.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Raj Shekhar Attri, J. (Oral) - Through this revision petition filed under Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short ‘Cr.P.C.’), petitioner is challenging order dated 30.05.2014 (Annexure P-5) in Criminal Complaint No.1008/2/09 of 22.07.2008, whereby the application filed under Section 311 Cr.P.C. for examination of expert witness to elicit the differences in ink on the cheque in dispute was declined.

2. Undisputedly, complainant/respondent-Amandeep Singh had filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against the petitioner. The case was fixed for defence evidence under Section 243 Cr.P.C. read with Section 247 Cr.P.C. He moved an application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. for permission to cross-examine the handwriting expert. The said application was contested by the complainant- Amandeep Singh and the same was dismissed vide order dated 30.05.2014 mainly on the ground that the accused has admitted his signatures on the cheque in question. Therefore, he cannot dispute with regard to his handwriting on the cheque.

3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the record.

4. Hon’ble the Supreme Court in Zahira Habibu



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top