SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(P&H) 2669

HARI PAL VERMA
Nishan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:Mr. Subhash Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Tanvir Joshi, AAG, Punjab.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Hari Pal Verma, J. (Oral) - Petitioner has filed instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No. 39, dated 14.05.2014, registered under Sections 420, 120-B, 406 IPC, Police Station Kahnwa, District Pathankot, taking into consideration the settlement/Agreement dated 15.12.2014 arrived at between the parties whereby the complainant Harjit Kaur has received an amount of Rs.1,20,000/- from the petitioner.

2. The FIR was registered at the behest of complainant against Bakshish Singh who is the father of the petitioner. Complainant levelled allegations against the accused that the petitioner allured the complainant to send his son abroad on work permit where he would arrange a job for him with a salary of Rs.30-40,000 per month. Accordingly, the complainant gave Rs.3 lacs to Bakshish Singh and Bakshish Singh further gave this money to Nishan Singh. Another sum of Rs.1 lac was to be given after sending Sohan Singh son of the complainant abroad. However, in the year 2011 when Sohan Singh went to Dubai along with Nishan Singh-petitioner, Bakshish Singh took the remaining Rs.1 lac from the house of the complainant. On reaching Dubai, petitioner-accused employe












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top