SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 517

RAJ MOHAN SINGH
Rajinder Aggarwal – Appellant
Versus
K. R. Finmark Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:Mr. R.S. Chugh, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Viren Jain, Advocate for the respondent.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Raj Mohan Singh, J.:- Vide this common order, CR No.5706 of 2018 titled Rajinder Aggarwal and another Vs. M/s K.R. Finmark Pvt. Ltd. and CR No.5782 of 2018 titled Bindu Aggarwal and others Vs. M/s K.R. Finmark Pvt, Ltd. are being disposed of. Facts are being taken from CR No.5706 of 2018.

2. Petitioners have challenged the order dated 02.05.2018 passed by Additional District Judge, Ludhiana in Civil Appeal titled Rajinder Aggarwal and another Vs. K.R. Finmark whereby the application under Section 10 CPC filed by the petitioners for staying the proceedings in the appeal was dismissed.

3. A civil suit for permanent injunction was filed by the respondent against the petitioners, seeking restraint against the defendants/petitioners from dispossessing the plaintiff/respondent and from interfering in the peaceful possession of the plaintiff over the suit property.

4. The said suit was decreed by the trial Court vide judgment and decree dated 05.08.2014. Defendants/petitioners were restrained from dispossessing or interfering in the peaceful possession of the plaintiff/respondent over the suit property.

5. An appeal was preferred before the Lower Appellate Court by the defenda














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top