Mr. Anil Kshetarpal, J. (Oral) - Tenant-petitioner is in revision petition against the order passed by the learned Rent Controller ordering his eviction upheld by the Appellate Authority in appeal.

2. The premises in question is part of a residential house and the landlord had sought eviction on the ground that his son is of marriageable age and his daughters who are married also visit their parental house and stay. It was pleaded that they do not have any drawing room for accommodating/entertaining guests. Learned Rent Controller as well as Appellate Authority after considering various aspects and contentions raised have ordered eviction.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has made following submissions:-

1. The sale deed through which the landlod claims title has not been produced.

2. There is no relationship of landlord and tenant as tenant has never attorned the tenancy.

3. The petition filed by the landlord was result of concealment of fact and therefore, liable to be dismissed.

On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents has pointed out that the sale in favour of the landlord by Smt. Kusum was never disputed by the tenant while filing the written statem