SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 602

RAMENDRA JAIN
Lakhwinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
Welkin Sales & Marketing – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:Mr. Peeush Gagneja, Advocate, for the applicant.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Armanda Jain, J. (Oral) - Through instant application under Section 378(4) Cr.P.C. applicant-complainant has sought leave to file appeal against impugned judgment dated 28.02.2017 of the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Abohar, whereby his complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short the ‘Act’) has been dismissed.

2. In nutshell, applicant filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Act against the respondents on the allegations that deceased Vimal Soni and respondent No.2 were partners in respondent No.1 firm in the ratio of 95:5. Deceased Vimal Soni issued a cheque of Rs.25,00,000/- of Axis Bank Ltd., Branch Abohar, in the name of applicant against advancement of loan by the applicant to him and respondent No.2 to run respondent No.1 firm. However, neither respondent No.1 nor respondent No.2 returned the cheque amount after the death of Vimal Soni, though they were legally bound to pay the same. After holding trial, trial Court dismissed the complaint of the applicant vide impugned judgment dated 28.02.2017.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant inter alia contends that since deceased Vimal Soni and respondent No.2 were advanced loan b




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top