SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 603

INDERJIT SINGH
Chiranji Lal Goyal – Appellant
Versus
Praveen Kumar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:Mr. Harkesh Manuja, Advocate for the applicant.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Inderjit Singh, J. - This order will dispose of the above mentioned two criminal miscellaneous applications filed under Section 378(4) Cr.P.C. against Praveen Kumar for grant of leave to appeals against the impugned judgments dated 17.09.2016 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Hisar, vide which the complaints filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the NI Act’) have been dismissed and the accused has been acquitted of the charges as framed against him.

2. It has been mainly submitted in the applications that the applicant is filing the accompanying criminal appeals against the judgments of acquittal which are likely to succeed as per grounds mentioned therein. It has been stated that there has been ample evidence on record to prove the guilt against the respondent. It has, therefore, been prayed that these applications be allowed and leave be granted to the applicant to file appeals.

3. The brief facts of the cases as noted down by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Hisar, in her judgment dated 17.9.2016, are as under:-

“Factual matrix of the instant complaint, as averred by the complainant, are tha










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top