SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 662

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Before
Deepak Sibal
CR-10288-2018 (O&M)
M/s Khass Fashion & Anr
v.
Gurinder Singh
{Decided on 05/02/2019}

Advocates Appeared:Mr. Prateek Sodhi, Advocate for Mr. Umesh Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Jasminder Singh Thind, Advocate for the respondent.

Stay on Execution – Suit was decreed exparte – Till disposal of application for setting aside of exparte decree its execution stayed.

Headnote:Civil Procedure Code, 1908, O.9 R.13 and O.21 R.26 – Stay on Execution – Suit for recovery was decreed exparte – Application under O.9 R.13 CPC is pending – Direction issued to Appellate Court to decide the petitioner’s appeal or at least stay the application – Till disposal of application for setting aside of exparte decree its execution stayed. (Para 6)

JUDGMENT

Mr. Deepak Sibal, J. (Oral) - The present petition is directed against the order dated 10.12.2018 passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Amritsar (for short – the Executing Court) through which warrants for attachment of the petitioners’ property have been issued in execution proceedings initiated by the respondent to execute ex parte decree dated 10.10.2013 through which he has been held entitled to recover from the petitioners a sum of Rs.4,30,582/- alongwith future interest @ 18% per annum.

2. The facts, in brief, which are required to be noticed for adjudicating upon the present petition are that the respondent filed a suit to recover from the petitioners a sum of Rs.4,30,582/- alongwith future interest. Such suit filed by the respondent was accepted through an ex parte decree dated 10.10.2013. The petitioners filed an application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC for setting aside the aforesaid ex parte judgment and decree dated 10.10.2013 which was dismissed by the Trial Court on 31.05.2018 against which they filed an appeal which is pending before the Appellate Court.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that till the time the petitioners’ appeal or at least the application for stay filed by them alongwith their appeal to challenge therein the dismissal of their application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC is adjudicated upon, the warrants of possession issued in the execution proceedings initiated by the respondent should be kept in abeyance as according to him if the aforesaid ex parte judgment and decree dated 10.10.2013 is executed, the statutory remedy availed of by the petitioners would be virtually rendered infructuous.

4. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that since there is no interim order in favour of the petitioners, the Executing Court is rightly proceeding with the execution proceedings initiated by the respondent.

5. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, in the peculiar facts of this case, this Court is of the opinion that the ends of justice would be served by issuance of a direction to the Appellate Court to decide the petitioners’ appeal or at least the stay application filed by the petitioners alongwith their appeal within two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

6. Till the petitioners’ appeal or at least the stay application filed by the petitioners alongwith their appeal is not adjudicated upon, the aforesaid ex parte judgment and decree dated 10.10.2013 shall not be executed.

7. The present petition is disposed of in the above terms.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top