SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 673

HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
Sant Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:Mr. Sarla Chaudhary, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana

JUDGMENT

Mr. Harinder Singh Sidhu, J. - This petition has been filed praying for directions to quash the order of the Commissioner, Rohtak Division, Rohtak dated 3.10.2018 (Annexure P-1) whereby the application of the petitioner for release on parole has been rejected. It has also been prayed that the respondents be directed to release the petitioner on parole for house repair.

2. As stated in the petition, the petitioner is undergoing rigorous imprisonment for life in a case under Sections 302/34 IPC registered at Police Station Sampla, District Rohtak after his conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtak.

3. The petitioner submitted an application to the Superintendent, District Jail, Rohtak for grant of parole for the purpose of House Repair, which was forwarded to the District Magistrate, Rohtak, who recommended the release of the petitioner on parole. The Superintendent of Police in his report stated that the petitioner has relations with gang and has rivalry in the village and if he comes on parole, he may abscond and may commit some offence. There can be apprehension of breach of peace in the village. Based on the said report, the Commissioner, Rohtak Division, Rohta

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top