SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 707

AMOL RATTAN SINGH
Ranjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
Prem Parkash (deceased) through his LRs. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:Mr. Lekh Raj Nandal, Advocate, for the petitioner.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Amol Rattan Singh, J. (Oral):- By this petition, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 15.02.2018, passed by the learned District Judge, Rohtak, allowing the application filed by the respondent herein, under Order IX Rule 13 CPC, directing the trial Court to allow him to grant one opportunity to contest Civil Suit No. 105, decided on 26.07.2013.

2. Yesterday when the case came up for hearing, without noticing that the impugned order is actually dated 15.02.2018, i.e. more than one year ago, and that this petition has been filed on 24.01.2019, this Court had asked learned counsel for the petitioner to distinguish the judgment of this Court cited by the learned appellate Court in Dharampal Singh vs. Amar Singh and others, 2013 (7) RCR (Civil) 2561, to hold that the procedure in effecting service of notice issued not having been shown to be specifically followed, the onus was actually upon the plaintiff to show that the procedure had been followed.

3. Today, having seen that the impugned order was passed more than one year ago, and on query put to learned counsel as to the stage of the trial, he has submitted that after the order was passed and the trial recommence




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top