SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 708

AVNEESH JHINGAN
Krishna Devi through LRs – Appellant
Versus
Sita Rani – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:Mr. Charanpreet Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Avneesh Jhingan, J. (Oral):- The present petition has been filed being aggrieved of the order dated 13.2.2019 passed by the Additional District Judge, Ludhiana (hereinafter described as ‘Appellate Court’) dismissing the application filed by the petitioners-defendants (hereinafter described as ‘the petitioners’) under Order XLI Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, ‘CPC’).

2. The brief facts are that the respondents-plaintiffs (hereinafter described as ‘the respondents’) filed a suit for permanent injunction for restraining the petitioners from interfering in their peaceful possession of the property bearing No. 77/1, situated at Jawahar Nagar, Ludhiana on the ground that petitioners No. 1 to 5 had mortgaged one room of the said property on the ground floor vide agreement/mortgage deed dated 1.11.2011 to the husband of respondent No.1. On notice, the petitioners filed written statement. The suit was decreed vide judgment and decree dated 10.5.2018 by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana. The suit was decreed as the petitioners never cross-examined the witnesses of the respondents despite the opportunities given to them and moreover two witnesses,
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top