Rajiv Narain Raina, J.

C.M. No. 10323 of 2015 For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and the main case is taken on Board today itself for final disposal.

MAIN CASE

1. Heard. The respondent 3-worker was appointed as a part time worker for cooking food for children for the mid-day meal scheme launched by the Central and State Government in tandem in government schools in Haryana. When her services were dispensed with she raised an industrial dispute by serving a demand notice. Conciliation failed and the dispute was referred to the labour court for adjudication. The reference has been allowed and reinstatement has been ordered by setting aside the termination order. A finding of fact has been returned that she was in continuous service on part time basis till December 01, 2012. She then drew a salary of Rs. 1250 per month. The termination has been brought about without complying with the mandatory provisions of section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short "the Act") inasmuch as neither notice nor wages in lieu of notice nor retrenchment compensation was paid to her when her services were terminated. The respondent-worker also pleaded b